Diferencia entre revisiones de «Análisis de tráfico»

De gacq wiki
Saltar a: navegación, buscar
 
(Analisis de trafico)
 
(No se muestran 26 ediciones intermedias de 2 usuarios)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
 +
=Herramientas=
 +
*[[Flowscan]]
 +
 +
 
=Analisis de trafico=
 
=Analisis de trafico=
==NetFlow==
+
Guias
Informacion
+
*http://www.gulag.org.mx/doc_netflow.php
*http://www.switch.ch/tf-tant/floma/software.html
+
*http://www.dynamicnetworks.us/netflow/
 +
 
 +
==ntop==
 +
ntop --set-admin-password
 +
*http://www.ntop.org
 +
http://localhost:3000/
  
==flowscan==
 
http://www.caida.org/tools/utilities/flowscan/
 
Reportes de ejemplo:
 
*http://mrtg.uv.es/flowscan/
 
*http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu/
 
*http://flowscan.frgp.net/
 
  
===fprobe y flowscan===
 
Para el analisis de trafico hay que ver todo lo que pasa por la interface con: fprobe-ng
 
Esta información es capturada por: flow-tools
 
<pre><nowiki>
 
apt-get install fprobe-ng flow-tools
 
vi /etc/flow-tools/flow-capture.conf
 
</nowiki></pre>
 
  
 
==flow-tools vs cflowd==
 
==flow-tools vs cflowd==
Línea 25: Línea 21:
 
*flow-tools is actively maintained, and supports newer NetFlow versions, including those from the popular Cisco Cat6K series platforms
 
*flow-tools is actively maintained, and supports newer NetFlow versions, including those from the popular Cisco Cat6K series platforms
  
flow-tools only required a small change to FlowScan:
 
  
  

Revisión actual del 11:57 24 ago 2006

Herramientas


Analisis de trafico

Guias

ntop

ntop --set-admin-password

http://localhost:3000/


flow-tools vs cflowd

Why use flow-tools instead of cflowd?

  • flow-capture preserves the sub-second portion of the NetFlow timestamps that cflowd discards
  • flow-tools is easier to build because it is written in portable C. Problems with building cflowd may occur because it requires cutting edge C++ features
  • flow-tools is actively maintained, and supports newer NetFlow versions, including those from the popular Cisco Cat6K series platforms


Otros